4.6 Article

Irrigation level affects isoflavone concentrations of early maturing soya bean cultivars

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE
卷 193, 期 4, 页码 238-246

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037X.2007.00263.x

关键词

cultivars; daidzein; genistein; glycitein; irrigation; isoflavone; management; soya bean

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Field experiments were conducted in 2003/2004 in Quebec to determine the effects of irrigation levels (none, low and high) and cultivars (AC Orford, AC Proteina and Golden) on soya bean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] isollavone concentrations and yields. Seed yield, yield components, and oil and crude protein (CP) concentrations were concurrently determined. Response to irrigation was greater in 2003, which was substantially warmer and drier than in 2004. In both years, most responses were observed with the lower of the two irrigation levels evaluated, which increased total isollavones concentration by an average of 45% compared with a non-irrigated control. Cultivars, however, responded differently to irrigation. In 2003, response of AC Proteina was greater than that of AC Orford, while Golden did not respond. In 2004, some responses were observed with AC Proteina and Golden but none with AC Orford. Overall, in both years, AC Proteina had the greatest isollavone concentrations and AC Orford the lowest. Responses of seed yield and yield components depended on the year and were also greater in 2003. Both irrigation treatments generally increased seed yield and yield components compared with a non-irrigated control; the response was greater with the higher irrigation level. Irrigation had no effect on oil and CP concentrations. Finally, isoflavone yield response to irrigation was again greater in 2003, and depended on the cultivar. Results thus demonstrate that specific soil moisture levels will maximize soya bean isollavone concentrations, excess irrigation sometimes negating any potential benefits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据