4.7 Article

Rapid determination of retinoic acid and its main isomers in plasma by second-order high-performance liquid chromatography data modeling

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 406, 期 30, 页码 7989-7998

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-014-8268-8

关键词

Endogenous compounds; Retinoic acid; Second-order calibration; Plasma

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional del Litoral (projects CAI+D) [11-25, 11-11]
  2. CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas, Project PIP) [455]
  3. ANPCyT (Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica) [PICT 2011-0005]
  4. CONICET

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports the development of a method based on high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled to second-order data modeling with multivariate curve resolution-alternating least-squares (MCR-ALS) for quantification of retinoic acid and its main isomers in plasma in only 5.5 min. The compounds retinoic acid (RA), 13-cis-retinoic acid, 9-cis-retinoic acid, and 9,13-di-cis-retinoic acid were partially separated by use of a Poroshell 120 EC-C18 (3.0 mmx30 mm, 2.7 mu m particle size) column. Overlapping not only among the target analytes but also with the plasma interferents was resolved by exploiting the second-order advantage of the multi-way calibration. A validation study led to the following results: trueness with recoveries of 98.5-105.9 % for RA, 95.7-110.1 % for 13-cis-RA, 97.1-110.8 % for 9-cis-RA, and 99.5-110.9 % for 9,13-di-cis-RA; repeatability with RSD of 3.5-3.1 % for RA, 3.5-1.5 % for 13-cis-RA, 4.6-2.7 % for 9-cis-RA, and 5.2-2.7 % for 9,13-di-cis-RA (low and high levels); and intermediate precision (inter-day precision) with RSD of 3.8-3.0 % for RA, 2.9-2.4 % for 13-cis-RA, 3.6-3.2 % for 9,13-di-cis-RA, and 3.2-2.9 % for 9-cis-RA (low and high levels). In addition, a robustness study revealed the method was suitable for monitoring patients with dermatological diseases treated with pharmaceutical products containing RA and 13-cis-RA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据