4.7 Article

A highly thermal-resistant electrospun-based polyetherimide nanofibers coating for solid-phase microextraction

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 406, 期 8, 页码 2141-2149

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-013-7407-y

关键词

Polyetherimide nanofibers; Electrospinning; Headspace solid phasemicroextraction; Gas chromatograpy-mass spectrometry; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

资金

  1. Research Council and Graduates School of Sharif University of Technology (SUT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A high-temperature-resistant solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fiber was prepared based on polyetherimide (PEI) by the electrospinning method. The PEI polymeric solution was converted to nanofibers using high voltages and directly coated on a stainless steel SPME needle. The scanning electron microscopy images of PEI coating showed fibers with diameter range of 500-650 nm with a homogeneous and smooth surface morphology. The SPME nanofibers coating was optimized for PEI percentage, electrospinning voltage, and time. The extraction efficiency of the coating was investigated for headspace SPME of some environmentally important polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from aqueous samples followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry measurement. In addition, the important extraction parameters including extraction temperature, extraction time, ionic strength, as well as desorption temperature and time were investigated and optimized. The detection limits of the method under optimized conditions ranged from 1 to 5 ng L-1 using time-scheduled selected ion monitoring mode. The relative standard deviations of the method were between 1.1 and 7.1 %, at a concentration level of 500 ng L-1. The calibration curves of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons showed linearity in the range of 5-1000 ng L-1. The developed method was successfully applied to real water samples and the relative recovery percentages obtained from the spiked water samples were from 84 to 98 % for all the selected analytes except for acenaphthene which was from 75 to 106 %.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据