4.4 Article

Androgen receptor or estrogen receptor-β blockade alters DHEA-, DHT-, and E2-induced proliferation and PSA production in human prostate cancer cells

期刊

PROSTATE
卷 67, 期 11, 页码 1152-1162

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pros.20585

关键词

DHEA; DHT; E-2; AR; ER beta; PSA; Casodex; ICI 182,780

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMHD NIH HHS [MD20892] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is an endogenous steroid that is metabolized to androgens and/or estrogens in the human prostate. DHEA levels decline with age, and use of DHEA supplements to retard the aging process is of unproved effectiveness and safety. LNCaP and LAPC-4 prostate cancer cells were used to determine whether DHEA-modulated proliferation and prostate specific antigen (PSA) production were mediated via the androgen receptor (AR) and/or ER beta. METHODS. Cells were treated with DHEA, DHT, or E-2 and antagonists to AR (Casodex R bicalutamide) or ER (ICI 182,780) or siRNA to the respective receptors. Proliferation was assessed by MTT assay and PSA mRNA and protein secretion were measured by quantitative real-time PCR and ELISA. Associations of AR and ER beta were analyzed by co-immunoprecipitation studies and fluorescent confocal microscopy. RESULTS. DHEA-, T-, and E-2-induced proliferation of LNCaP cells was blunted by Casodex but not by ICI treatment. In LNCaP cells, Casodex and ICI suppressed hormone-induced PSA production. In LAPC-4 cells, DHT-stimulated PSA mRNA was inhibited by Casodex and ICI, and the minimal stimulation by DHEA was inhibited by ICI. Use of siRNAs confirmed involvement of AR and ER beta in hormone-induced PSA production while AR-ER beta co-association was suggested by immunoprecipitation and nuclear co-localization. CONCLUSIONS. These findings support involvement of both AR and ER beta in mediating DHEA-, DHT-, and E2-induced PSA expression in prostate cancer cells. Prostate 67:1152-1162, 2007. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据