4.7 Article

High dose rate brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy in the radical treatment of prostate cancer: initial results of a randomised phase three trial

期刊

RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY
卷 84, 期 2, 页码 114-120

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.04.011

关键词

prostate cancer; radiotherapy; external beam; brachytherapy; high dose rate

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and purpose: A randomised phase III trial has compared external beam radiotherapy alone with a dose escalated schedule using high dose rate brachytherapy. Patients with histologically confirmed prostate cancer, no evidence of metastases, a PSA < 50, no previous TURP and fit for general anaesthetic were included. Methods: Patients were randomised to receive either standard radiotherapy 55 Gy in 20 fractions treating Monday to Friday over 4 weeks or a combined schedule comprising external beam treatment delivering 35.75 Gy in 13 fractions treating daily Monday to Friday over 2.5 weeks followed by a temporary high dose rate afterloading implant delivering 17 Gy in two fractions over 24 h. Results: A total of 220 patients were randomised, balanced for important prognostic parameters including tumour stage, presenting PSA, Gleason score and use of adjuvant anti-androgens. With a median follow up of 30 months (range 3-91) a significant improvement in actuarial biochemical relapse-free survival is seen in favour of the combined brachytherapy schedule (p = 0.03). A lower incidence of acute rectal discharge was seen in the brachytherapy group (p = 0.025) and other acute and late toxicities were equivalent. Patients randomised to brachytherapy had a significantly better FACT-P score at 12 weeks (p = 0.02). Conclusions: The use of high dose rate brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy resulted in an improved biochemical relapse-free survival compared to external beam radiotherapy alone with less acute rectal toxicity and improved quality of life in this randomised trial. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据