4.5 Review

Changes in disease pattern and treatment outcome of colorectal cancer: A review of 5,474 cases in 20 years

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 855-862

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-007-0293-z

关键词

colorectal cancer; treatment; prognosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and aims Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death in Taiwan. During the past 20 years, several advances have improved the treatment outcome and quality of life of CRC patients. The purpose of this study was to identify the changes in the clinicopathological features and outcome of CRC over this period. Materials and methods Based on the computerized database of the Taipei Veterans General Hospital, between January 1981 and December 2000, 5,474 CRC patients were identified and divided into 2 groups based on the date of treatment (1981-1990 and 1991-2000). The clinicopathological features, outcome, and prognostic factors were analyzed and compared. Results/findings The age at onset of cancer was 61 years in the 1980s group and 66 years in the 1990s group. The frequency of rectal tumors decreased from 50% in the 1980s group to 44% in the 1990s group. Tumor, nodes, metastasis (TNM) stage distribution, surgical mortality, and anastomosis leakage were similar in the two groups. However, the 5-year overall survival rate was better in the 1990s group (56%) than that in the 1980s group (50%, P=0.001). For rectal cancer patients, the local recurrence rate was lower in the 1990s group (6%) than that in the 1980s group (10%, P < 0.01). In stage III CRC, the 5-year overall survival rate was significantly higher in the 1990s group (54%) than that in the 1980s group (48%, P=0.011). TNM stage was the most important independent prognostic factor for overall and disease-free survivals, followed by differentiation grade, CEA level, and treatment period. Interpretation/conclusion Advances in surgical technique and more standard use of chemotherapy have improved CRC outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据