4.7 Article

Changes of phenolic metabolism and oxidative status in nitrogen-deficient Matricaria chamomilla plants

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 297, 期 1-2, 页码 255-265

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-007-9346-x

关键词

catalase; chlorophyll; malondialdehyde; nitrogen deficiency; guaiacol peroxidase; phenylalanine ammonia-lyase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effects of nitrogen deficiency on selected physiological attributes, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL, EC. 4.3.1.5) activity, phenolic contents, peroxidase (EC. 1.11.1.7) and catalase (EC. 1.11.1.6) activities, lipid peroxidation status and H2O2 accumulation were studied in N-deficient Matricaria chamomilla (L.) over 12 days. N deficiency enhanced root growth and inhibited shoot growth. Chlorophyll composition and F (v)/F (m) were not affected by N stress, but nitrogen and soluble proteins decreased in both the rosettes and the roots. PAL activity, expressed per mg protein, was enhanced in N-deficient rosettes and tended to decrease by the end of the experiment, while in the roots PAL activity was maintained. Total phenolic contents increased in both rosettes and roots. Peroxidase and catalase activities in N-deficient rosettes tended to decrease by the end of the experiment, while in the roots they increased on the 12th day of deficiency. Furthermore, lipid peroxidation status increased in N-deficient roots on the 12th day, indicating that antioxidative protection was insufficient to scavenge reactive oxygen species being generated. Surprisingly, H2O2 content was even lower in N-deficient roots by the end of the experiment, while in the leaves increased. This observation in correlation to lipid peroxidation and H2O2 degradation is discussed. The importance of PAL activity and phenolic metabolites in combination with antioxidative enzymes for plant protection against oxidative stress and the significance of PAL activity for the mobilization of N availability in N-deficient tissue are also discussed in view of existing information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据