4.7 Review

A systematic review and meta-analysis of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.107.145151

关键词

familial hypercholesterolemia; children; statins; safety; meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective - Functional and morphological changes of the arterial wall already present in young children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) suggest that treatment should be initiated early in life to prevent premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and particularly safety of statin therapy in children with HeFH. Methods and Results - We performed a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating statin therapy in children aged 8 to 18 years with HeFH. Six studies ( n = 798 children) with 12 to 104 weeks of treatment were included. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B were significantly reduced, whereas HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 were significantly increased by statin therapy. No statistically significant differences were found between statin- and placebo-treated children with respect to the occurrence of adverse events ( RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.25), sexual development ( RR of advancing >= 1 stage in Tanner classification 0.96; 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.17), muscle toxicity ( RR of CK >= 10 times the upper limit of normal [ULN] 1.38; 95% CI: 0.18 to 10.82), or liver toxicity ( RR of >= 3 times the ULN for ASAT 0.98; 95% CI: 0.23 to 4.26 and for ALAT 2.03; 95% CI: 0.24 to 16.95). We found a minimal difference in growth in favor of the statin group ( 0.33 cm; 95% CI: 0.03 cm to 0.63 cm). Conclusion - In addition to the fact that statin treatment is efficacious, our results support the notion that statin treatment in children with HeFH is safe. Thus, even though further studies are required to assess lifelong safety, statin treatment should be considered for all children aged 8 to 18 with HeFH.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据