4.7 Article

Functional tissue-engineered blood vessels from bone marrow progenitor cells

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 75, 期 3, 页码 618-628

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2007.04.018

关键词

stem cells; bone marrow; mesenchymal stem cells; alpha actin promoter; vascular tissue engineering; ovine; blood vessels; transcriptional activation; ovine animal model

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Stem cells have significant potential for development of cell-based therapeutics for cardiovascular tissue regeneration. Methods: We developed a novel method for isolating smooth muscle cells (SMC) from ovine bone marrow using a tissue-specific promoter and fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Results: As compared to vascular SMC, bone marrow-derived smooth muscle progenitor cells (BM-SMPC) exhibited similar morphology, showed higher proliferation potential and expressed several SMC markers including (alpha-actin, calponin, myosin heavy chain, smoothelin, caldesmon and SM22. When embedded in fibrin hydrogels, BM-SMPC contracted the matrix and displayed receptor- and non-receptor-mediated contractility, indicating that BM-SMPC can generate force in response to vasoreactive agonists. We also prepared tissue-engineered blood vessels from BM-SMPC and BM-derived endothelial cells and implanted them into the jugular veins of lambs. As early as five weeks post-implantation, grafted tissues displayed a confluent endothelial layer overlaying the medial layer in which BM-SMPC were aligned circumferentially and synthesized significant amounts of collagen. In contrast to previous results with vascular SMC, BM-SMPC synthesized high amounts of elastin that was organized in a fibrillar network very similar to that of native vessels. Conclusions: Our results suggest that BM-SMPC may be useful in studying SMC differentiation and have high potential for development of cell therapies for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. (c) 2007 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据