4.4 Article

Improved in vitro model systems for gastrointestinal infection by choice of cell line, pH, microaerobic conditions, and optimization of culture conditions

期刊

HELICOBACTER
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 341-353

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2007.00509.x

关键词

mucin; microaerobic culture; bacterial-mammalian co-culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Commonly used in vitro infection cultures do not mimic the human gastrointestinal tract with regard to pH and microaerobic conditions. Furthermore, despite the importance of mucin-Helicobacter interactions, the cell lines used have not been selected for appropriate mucin expression. To make in vitro studies more applicable to human disease, we have developed coculture methods taking these factors into account. Materials and methods: Nine human gastrointestinal epithelial cell lines (MKN1, MKN7, MKN28, MKN45, KATO3, FIFE145, PCAA/CII Caco-2, and LS513) were investigated. Expression and glycosylation of mucins (MUC 1, 2, 3, 4, 5AC, 5B, 6, 12, 13, and 16) were determined by irou'lLmohistochernistry. We analyzed the effect of microacrobic conditions and acidic pH on cell proliferation, viability, and apoptosis. Results: Microaerobic culture, which is more physiological for the bacteria, did not adversely affect mammalian cell viability, proliferation, or induce apoptosis The cell lines varied in mucin expression, with MKN7 and MKN45 being most similar to gastric mucosa and Caco-2 and LS513 to intestinal mucosa, although none exactly matched normal mucosa. However, changes in culture conditions did not cause major changes in the mucin expression within cell lines. Conclusions: Culture conditions mimicking the natural environment and allowing the bacterial cells to thrive had no effect on cell viability or apoptosis, and very little influence on mucin expression of human gastrointestinal cells. Thus, it is feasible, using the simple methods we present here, to substantially improve bacterial-mammalian cell in vitro coculture studies to make them more reflective of human infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据