4.7 Article

Evaluation of hydrophobicity/oleophilicity of kapok and its performance in oily water filtration: Comparison of raw and solvent-treated fibers

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 125-134

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.02.007

关键词

oily water; kapok; filtration; separation; fiber; solvent; deep-bed filter; hydrophobicity; oleophilicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Kapok (Ceiba pentandra) fiber, an agricultural product, contains waxy material that contributes to its hydrophobic-oleophilic characteristics. lts performances, as untreated and solvent-treated fibers, in deep-bed filtration of oily water containing 2.5% diesel were assessed in this study. The solvents used were ethanol and chloroform. The filtration performance was assessed through measurements of column breakthrough time, filtration rate, filtrate quality, and the amount of oil retained by the filter column at breakthrough under a constant vacuum pressure. The kapok fibers, both at its natural state and after solvent treatments, demonstrated excellent oil/water separation and filtration, for which oil was retained while water was filtered through the kapok filter column. The filtrate quality, in terms of turbidity and percent oil removal, appeared to be unaffected by the solvent treatment of the kapok fiber. The oil removal efficiencies consistently exceeded 99%. However, the filter column packed with solvent-treated kapok fibers showed premature breakthrough of the oily influent and produced less filtrate than that by the untreated kapok. The filter column packed with the solvent-treated kapok also retained less oil compared to the untreated kapok, and as a result, a quarter of the filter pore volume was not wetted even after breakthrough. This could be the main cause for the premature breakthrough of the oily influent. Apparently, the solvent treatment for impurities removal could impair the oleophilicity/hydrophobicity of the kapok fibers which was crucial for the oily water separation and filtration. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据