4.7 Article

Novel magnetic bovine serum albumin imprinted polymers with a matrix of carbon nanotubes, and their application to protein separation

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 401, 期 9, 页码 2855-2863

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-011-5373-9

关键词

Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIPs); Magnetic nanoparticles; Carbon nanotube; Surface imprinting; Protein separation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21005030]
  2. Research Foundation of Education Bureau of Hunan Province, China [10A099]
  3. Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel magnetic multi-walled carbon nanotubes@Fe3O4 molecularly imprinted polymers (MWNTs@Fe3O4-MIPs) intended for bovine serum albumin (BSA) recognition were successfully developed. The MWNTs@Fe3O4-MIPs were characterized with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR). Scanning electron microscopy images showed that the Fe3O4 nanoparticles (diameter: 50-60 nm) were coated with a layer of MIPs with an average thickness of 25-30 nm. The magnetic material was easily dispersed and retrieved through the application of an external magnetic field. Adsorption experiments showed that the estimated maximum amount of BSA that could be adsorbed onto the MWNTs@Fe3O4-MIPs was 52.8 mg/g, and the time taken to reach equilibrium was about 40 min. Meanwhile, the MWNTs@Fe3O4-MIPs exhibited excellent selectivity towards (i.e., recognition of) BSA. The feasibility of the use of the MWNTs@Fe3O4-MIPs as a solid-phase extraction (SPE) sorbent was evaluated, and the results showed that the MWNTs@Fe3O4-MIPs were able to separate the template protein BSA from a binary protein solution. The proposed sorbent based on MWNTs@Fe3O4-MIPs for BSA separation exhibited satisfactory recoveries ranging from 92.0% to 97.3% in real samples. It was also successfully used for the purification of BSA from bovine calf serum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据