4.1 Article

The reproductive biology of the depressed river mussel, Pseudanodonta complanata (Bivalvia: Unionidae), with implications for its conservation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLLUSCAN STUDIES
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 259-266

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mollus/eym023

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pseudanodonta complanatais listed as 'Near Threatened' on the IUCN Red List (IUCN, 2006) and is a species of conservation priority on the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. The UK is host to some of the largest populations of this species, but little is known about their reproductive biology. Two populations were studied in the Great Ouse catchment and the Waveney and Yare catchment, East Anglia, UK. Both populations are reproductively active, producing viable glochidia. Small mussels (< 30 mm length) in both catchments indicate that recruitment is occurring. A short non-gravid period in May is followed by three months of glochidial formation in June, July and August; by September mussels contain mature glochidia ready for release the following April. Females brood between 5,000 and 50,000 glochidia, and this scales with mussel length L (mm) as: n(gloch)proportional to L-2.1. The sex ratio is skewed towards females (2.5 females:1 male), and males are larger than females. No hermaphrodites were found during the histological examination of the gonads of 24 mussels. The in vivo examination of demibranchs is shown to be an effective nonsacrificial means of determining sex and gravidity. Conservation recommendations include: minimizing management operations in river stretches containing large populations; avoiding forms of management which preferentially remove large mussels (i.e. males and the most fecund females); performing management during the non-gravid period to avoid causing the premature release of glochidia; leaving sufficient time between management operations for populations to recover; and temporarily translocating mussels to refugia during management operations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据