3.9 Article

Self-aggregation of Cryptococcus neoformans capsular glucuronoxylomannan is dependent on divalent cations

期刊

EUKARYOTIC CELL
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 1400-1410

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/EC.00122-07

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL059842, HL059842] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [AI052733, AI033774, R37 AI033142, R01 AI033142, R01 AI033774, AI033142, R01 AI052733] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The capsular components of the human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans are transported to the extracellular space and then used for capsule enlargement by distal growth. It is not clear, however, how the glucuronoxylomannan (GXM) fibers are incorporated into the capsule. In the present study, we show that concentration of C neoformans culture supernatants by ultrafiltration results in the formation of highly viscous films containing pure polysaccharide, providing a novel, nondenaturing, and extremely rapid method to isolate extracellular GXM. The weight-averaged molecular mass of GXM in the film, determined using multiangle laser light scattering, was ninefold smaller than that of GXM purified from culture supernatants by differential precipitation with cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB). Polysaccharides obtained either by ultrafiltration or by CTAB-mediated precipitation showed different reactivities with GXM-specific monoclonal antibodies. Viscosity analysis associated with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and measurements of zeta potential in the presence of different ions implied that polysaccharide aggregation was a consequence of the interaction between the carboxyl groups of glucuronic acid and divalent cations. Consistent with this observation, capsule enlargement in living C. neoformans cells was influenced by Ca2+ in the culture medium. These results suggest that capsular assembly in C neoformans results from divalent cation-mediated self-aggregation of extracellularly accumulated GXM molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据