4.7 Article

Molecular size and mass distributions of native starches using complementary separation methods: Asymmetrical Flow Field Flow Fractionation (A4F) and Hydrodynamic and Size Exclusion Chromatography (HDC-SEC)

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 399, 期 4, 页码 1493-1505

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-4208-4

关键词

Asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation; Hydrodynamic chromatography; Hydrodynamic radius calibration curves; Macromolecular size distribution; Starch

资金

  1. Conseil Regional des Pays de la Loire

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Starch consists of a mixture of two alpha-glucans built mainly upon alpha-(1,4) linkages: amylose, an essentially linear polymer, and amylopectin, a branched polymer containing 5-6% of alpha-(1,6) linkages. The aim of the present work was to analyze the structural properties of native starches displaying different amylose-to-amylopectin ratios and arising from different botanical sources, using asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation (A4F) and a combination of hydrodynamic and size-exclusion chromatography (HDC-SEC) coupled with multiangle laser light scattering, online quasi-elastic light scattering, and differential refractive index techniques. The procedure, based upon dimethyl sulfoxide pretreatment and then solubilization in water, generates a representative injected sample without altering the initial degree of polymerization. The amylopectin weight-average molar masses and radii of gyration were around 1.0 x 10(8)-4.8 x 10(8) g mol(-1) and 110-267 nm, respectively. For each starch sample, the hydrodynamic radius (R(H)) distributions and the molar mass distributions obtained from the two fractionation systems coupled with light scattering techniques were analyzed. The size determination scales were extended by means of R(H) calibration curves. HDC-SEC and A4F data could be matched. However, A4F enabled a better separation of amylopectins and therefore an enhanced structural characterization of the starches. The two advantages of this experimental approach are (1) it can directly obtain distributions as a function of both molar mass and size, while taking account of sample heterogeneity, and (2) it is possible to compare the results obtained using the different techniques through the direct application of R(H) distributions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据