4.4 Article

Development of a low-cost, insect larvae-derived recombinant subunit vaccine against RHDV

期刊

VIROLOGY
卷 364, 期 2, 页码 422-430

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.03.016

关键词

RHDV; recombinant vaccine; calicivirus; baculovirus; larvae; low-cost; insect expression system

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vaccine antigens against rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) are currently derived from inactivated RHDV obtained from livers of experimentally infected rabbits. Several RHDV-derived recombinant immunogens have been reported. However, their application in vaccines has been restricted due to their high production costs. In this paper, we describe the development of an inexpensive, safe, stable vaccine antigen for RHDV. A baculovirus expressing a recombinant RHDV capsid protein (VP60r) was used to infect Trichoplusia ni insect larvae. It reached an expression efficiency of 12.5% of total soluble protein, i.e. similar to 2 mg of VP60r per larva. Preservation of the antigenicity and immunogenicity of the VP60r was confirmed by immunological and immunization experiments. Lyophilized crude larvae extracts, containing VP60r, were stable, at room temperature, for at least 800 days. In all cases, rabbits immunized with a single dose of VP60r by the intramuscular route were protected against RBDV challenge. Doses used were as low as 2 mu g of VP60r in the presence of adjuvant or 100 mu g without one. Orally administered VP60r in the absence of an adjuvant gave no protection. The potential costs of an RHDV vaccine made using this technology would be reduced considerably compared with producing the same protein in insect cells maintained by fermentation. In conclusion, the larva expression system may provide a broad-based strategy for production of recombinant subunit antigens (insectigens) for human or animal medicines, especially when production costs restrain their use. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据