4.5 Article

Sulphate adsorption at the Fe(hydr)oxide-H2O interface:: comparison of cluster and periodic slab DFT predictions

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 978-988

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00936.x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transport and bioavailability of sulphate in soils are significantly affected by adsorption reactions at the mineral-H2O interface. Therefore, an understanding of the mechanisms and kinetics of sulphate adsorption is of fundamental importance in soil chemistry. In this investigation, the binding geometries of bidentate bridging and monodentate sulphate complexes at the Fe (hydr)oxide-H2O interface were predicted with static cluster and periodic slab density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The cluster calculations were performed with edge-sharing dioctahedral Fe3+ models, using the unrestricted PBEO exchange-correlation functional and a combination of effective core potential (LanL2DZ - Fe atoms) and all-electron (6-311 +G(d,p) or 6-311 +G(3df,p) - S, O, and H atoms) basis sets. The periodic slab calculations were performed with a (3 x 2) slab of the (100) (alpha-FeOOH surface, by means of the projector-augmented wave method and a plane-wave basis set. For the periodic slab DFT calculations, the spin-polarized (SP) PBE exchange-correlation functional, with and without explicit consideration of an on-site Coulomb interaction parameter (i.e. SP-PBE and SP-PBE+U methods), was used. Despite the lack of long-range order, cluster model predictions of the interatomic distances and angles of bidentate bridging and monodentate sulphate were in good agreement with the periodic slab model predictions. Quantitative analysis of the cluster and periodic slab DFT predictions is expected to result from theoretical fitting of extended X-ray absorption fine structure measurements. The application of computational chemistry methods to soil chemistry research is anticipated to provide novel insight into the mechanisms and kinetics of ion sorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据