4.7 Article

Receptor heterodimerization leads to a switch in signaling:: β-arrestin2-mediated ERK activation by μ-δ opioid receptor heterodimers

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 21, 期 10, 页码 2455-2465

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.06-7793com

关键词

G-protein-coupled receptors; morphine; oligomerization; 7TM receptors; enkephalin; narcotic addiction

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R24 CA095823] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [K05 DA019521, R01 DA008863-17, K05 DA019521-08, R01 DA008863, R56 DA008863, DA019521, R37 DA008863, DA08863] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Opiates are analgesics of choice in the treatment of chronic pain, but their long-term use leads to the development of physiological tolerance. Thus, understanding the mechanisms modulating the response of their receptor, the mu opioid receptor (mu OR), is of great clinical relevance. Here we show that heterodimerization of mu OR with delta opioid receptors (delta OR) leads to a constitutive recruitment of beta-arrestin2 to the receptor complex resulting in changes in the spatiotemporal regulation of ERK1/2 signaling. The involvement of beta-arrestin2 is further supported by studies using beta-arrestin2 siRNA in cells endogenously expressing the heterodimers. The association of beta-rrestin2 with the heterodimer can be altered by treatment with a combination of mu OR agonist (DAMGO) and delta OR antagonist (Tipp psi), and this leads to a shift in the pattern of ERK1/2 phosphorylation to the pattern observed with mu OR alone. These data indicate that, in the naive state, mu OR- delta OR heterodimers are in a conformation conducive to beta-arrestin-mediated signaling. Destabilization of this conformation by cotreatment with mu OR and delta OR ligands leads to a switch to a non-beta-arrestin- mediated signaling. Taken together, these results show for the first time that mu OR- delta OR heterodimers, by differentially recruiting beta-arrestin, modulate the spatio-temporal dynamics of opioid receptor signaling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据