4.7 Review

New opportunities in multiplexed optical bioanalyses using quantum dots and donor-acceptor interactions

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 398, 期 6, 页码 2439-2449

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-3837-y

关键词

Quantum dots; Multiplexing; Fluorescence resonance energy transfer; Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer; Gold nanoparticles; Charge transfer quenching

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. University of Toronto
  3. Ontario Ministry of Education and Training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review highlights recent trends in the development of multiplexed bioanalyses using quantum dot bioconjugates and donor-acceptor interactions. In these methods, multiple optical signals are generated in response to biorecognition through modulation of the photoluminescence of populations of quantum dots with different emission colors. The donor-acceptor interactions that have been used include fluorescence resonance energy transfer, bioluminescence resonance energy transfer, charge transfer quenching, and quenching via proximal gold nanoparticles. Assays for the simultaneous detection of between two and eight target analytes have been developed, where spectral deconvolution is an important tool. Target analytes have included small molecules, nucleic acid sequences, and proteases. The unique optical properties of quantum dots offer several potential advantages in multiplexed detection, and a large degree of versatility, for example, one pot multiplexing at the ensemble level, where only wavelength discrimination is required to differentiate between detection channels. These methods are not being developed to compete with array-based technologies in terms of overall multiplexing capacity, but rather to enable new formats for multiplexed bioanalyses. In particular, quantum dot bioprobes based on donor-acceptor interactions are anticipated to provide future opportunities for multiplexed biosensing within living cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据