4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Determination of fluoroquinolone residues in poultry muscle in Portugal

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 397, 期 6, 页码 2615-2621

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-010-3819-0

关键词

Fluoroquinolones; Chicken and turkey muscle tissue; Liquid chromatography; Spectrofluorimetric detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A total of 98 poultry samples, including chicken and turkey muscle, were analysed, using a sensitive and reliable analytical method based on liquid chromatography (LC) with spectrofluorimetric detection, for simultaneous determination of four fluoroquinolone (FQ) antibiotics, namely enrofloxacin (ENRO), ciprofloxacin (CIPRO), norfloxacin (NOR), and sarafloxacin (SARA). The method involved extraction with 0.15 mol L(-1) HCl and clean-up by solid-phase extraction using Oasis HLB cartridges. Chromatographic separation was carried out on a C(18) TSK gel column, in isocratic mode, with 0.025 mol L(-1) H(3)PO(4) solution, adjusted to pH 3.0 with tetrabutylammonium hydroxide-methanol (78:22) as mobile phase. Good linearity over the investigated concentration range was observed, with mean values of correlation coefficients higher than 0.9989 for all the analytes studied. The limits of quantification (LOQ), expressed as the lowest fortification level with acceptable precision were 15 mu g kg(-1) for ENRO, CIPRO, and NOR, and 30 mu g kg(-1) for SARA; these values are in compliance with requirements for monitoring of maximum residues levels (MRLs). Overall recoveries from spiked samples ranged from 80% to 92% with relative standard deviations (RSD) lower than 6.1%. Of the chicken and turkey samples analysed, 44.2% and 37.8%, respectively, were contaminated. The levels found in the analysed poultry samples, collected from markets of Oporto and Coimbra, located in the north and central zones of Portugal, respectively, were lower than 114.2 and 87.6 mu g kg(-1) in chicken and turkey muscle samples, respectively. One positive chicken sample was contaminated with ENRO at levels higher than the MRL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据