3.9 Article

Association between intelligence and coronary heart disease mortality: a population-based cohort study of 682361 Swedish men

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328014672e

关键词

coronary heart disease; mortality; intelligence; socio-economic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Socio-economic position and intelligence predict coronary heart disease but their mutual associations are not yet well understood. We investigated associations between intelligence and coronary heart disease mortality and explored if they are confounded or modified by socio-economic position. Design This was a cohort-based follow-up study. Methods Data on intelligence, systolic and diastolic blood pressures and body mass index were measured at conscription examination at age 18years in 682361 Swedish men born 1951-1965. Data on parental and own education and social position were derived from censuses in 1960,1970,1980 and 1990. Follow-up data up to end of 2001 were derived from the Swedish Cause of Death Register and 737 coronary heart disease deaths were observed. Data were analyzed by Cox regression and conditional logistic regression models. Results An inverse association was found between intelligence and coronary heart disease mortality after adjustment for parental and own education and social position, body mass index and blood pressure (hazard ratio 0.92; 95% confidence interval 0.88-0.96). These associations were of similar strengths within all socio-economic categories and also found within 215 brother pairs discordant for coronary heart disease mortality and intelligence (odds ratio 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.58-1.00). Conclusions Intelligence is associated with coronary heart disease mortality independently of socio-economic position. Health education messages should be tailored according to intellectual performance of the recipients, but also other factors are important for socio-economic coronary heart disease inequalities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据