4.5 Article

Interleukin-10 gene (IL10) polymorphisms and human papillomavirus clearance among immunosuppressed adolescents

期刊

CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 1626-1632

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0881

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [U01 HD32830] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is a major risk factor for cervical cancer, and HPV clearance seems to be under host genetic influence. This study evaluated associations between three single nucleotide polymorphisms in the IL10 promoter and clearance of low- or high-risk HPV infection in a cohort of 226 largely HIV-1-infected African-American adolescent females. Among immunosuppressed individuals (HIV-1 seropositive and CD4(+) <= 500), the GCC haplotype in the IL10 promoter was associated with reduced clearance of high-risk HPV16-like [relative hazard (RH), 0.46; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.25-0.85; P = 0.01], HPV18-like (RH, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.16-0.67; P = 0.002), and any high-risk type (RH, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20-0.68; P = 0.002) but not with low-risk HPV type (RH, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.29-1.25; P = 0.17). No associations were observed among immunocompetent individuals. The IL10 GCC haplotype has been associated with production of relatively high levels of interleukin (IL)-10, which could (a) inhibit cytokines such as IL-2, TNF-alpha, IL-4, IL-6, and IL-12 that are involved in the T(H)1-T(H)2 immunoregulation; (b) down-regulate expression of MHC class I and class 11 molecules; or (c) induce the transcription of early promoter of HPV, all potentially contributing to duration of HPV infection among immunosuppressed individuals. These results support the hypothesis that IL10 polymorphisms influence the clearance of infection with high-risk HPV types and warrant further studies of host genetic control of HPV pathogenesis and cervical cancer in the context of immunosuppression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据