4.7 Article

Pesticide residue determination in surface waters by stir bar sorptive extraction and liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 393, 期 6-7, 页码 1733-1743

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-2627-x

关键词

Surface water analysis; Stir-bar sorptive extraction; Environmental analysis; Liquid chromatography; Tandem mass spectrometry; Triple quadrupole

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology [CGL2007-C02-01/BOS]
  2. European Regional Development Funds (ERDFs)
  3. University of Chile

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) method, 16 pesticides were extracted from surface water samples by sorption onto 1 mm polydimethylsiloxane layer coated on a 10-mm-length stir bar magnet. After liquid desorption of the analytes with 1 ml of methanol, the detection was performed on a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with a triple quadrupole (QqQ) analyzer using selected reaction monitoring mode via electrospray ionization. Parameters affecting SBSE operation, including sample volume, salt addition, extraction time, stirring rate, and desorption conditions, have been evaluated. The optimized SBSE method required two 50 ml aliquots of surface water samples, one aliquot was added of 30% NaCl and stirred at 900 rpm during 1 h for testing five pesticides with log K-o/w<3, and the other aliquot was directly extracted following the same procedure for the rest of the pesticides with log K-o/w>3. The method was validated in spiked surface water samples at limits of quantifications (LOQs) and ten times the LOQs showing recoveries <62%, and the LOQs reached were from 0.03 mu g l(-1) for diazinon to 3 mu g l(-1) for simazine. The proposed methodology was applied to the determination of these compounds in samples from Albufera Lake and surrounding channels, showing that SBSE is a powerful tool for routine control analysis of pesticide residues in surface water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据