4.7 Article

Cloud-point extraction and reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography for the determination of carbamate insecticide residues in fruits

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 394, 期 5, 页码 1307-1317

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-2663-6

关键词

Cloud-point extraction; Triton X-114; Carbamate insecticides; Fruits; High-performance liquid chromatography

资金

  1. Center of Excellence for Innovation in Chemistry (PERCH-CIC)
  2. Commission on Higher Education, Ministry of Education and the Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee (RGJ) [PHD/0083/2549]
  3. Commission on Higher Education (CHE)
  4. CHE-RES-RG

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A cloud-point extraction (CPE) method using Triton X-114 non-ionic surfactant was developed for the extraction and preconcentration of carbamate insecticide residues (i.e., methomyl, propoxur, carbofuran, carbaryl, isoprocarb, and promecarb) in fruit samples. The optimum conditions of CPE were 1.5% (w/v) Triton X-114, 7.0% (w/v) NaCl and 20 min equilibrated at 45 A degrees C. The surfactant-rich phase was then analyzed by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection at 270 nm, under gradient separation using methanol and 0.1% (v/v) acetic acid. Under the study conditions, six carbamate insecticides were successfully separated within 27 min. Good reproducibility was obtained with the relative standard deviation of < 3% for retention time and < 9% for peak area. Limits of detection in the studied fruit samples were in the range of 0.1-1.0 mg kg(-1). No carbamate insecticides were detected in the studied fruit samples. The high recoveries of the spiked fruit samples were obtained in the range 80.0-107%. The CPE method has been shown to be a potential useful methodology for the preconcentration of the target analytes, with a preconcentration factor of 14. Moreover, the method is simple, has high sensitivity, consumes much less solvent than traditional methods, and is environmental friendly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据