4.7 Review

Sweeping and new on-line sample preconcentration techniques in capillary electrophoresis

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 394, 期 1, 页码 175-185

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-009-2646-7

关键词

On-line sample preconcentration; Sweeping; Sample stacking; Analyte focusing by micelle collapse; Capillary electrophoresis

资金

  1. University of Tasmania New Appointees Research Grant Scheme (NARGS)
  2. Institutional Research Grants Scheme (IRGS)
  3. President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo-Science and Engineering Graduate Scholarship (PGMA-SEGS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sweeping is a powerful on-line sample preconcentration technique that improves the concentration sensitivity of capillary electrophoresis (CE). This approach is designed to focus the analyte into narrow bands within the capillary, thereby increasing the sample volume that can be injected, without any loss of CE efficiency. It utilizes the interactions between an additive [i.e., a pseudostationary phase (PS) or complexing agent] in the separation buffer and the sample in a matrix that is devoid of the additive used. The accumulation occurs due to chromatographic partitioning, complexation or any interaction between analytes and the additive through electrophoresis. The extent of the preconcentration is dependent on the strength of interaction involved. Both charged and neutral analytes can be preconcentrated. Remarkable improvements-up to several thousandfold-in detection sensitivity have been achieved. This suggests that sweeping is a superior and general approach to on-line sample preconcentration in CE. The focusing mechanism of sweeping under different experimental conditions and its combination with other on-line preconcentration techniques are discussed in this review. The recently introduced techniques of transient trapping (tr-trapping) and analyte focusing by micelle collapse (AFMC) as well as other novel approaches to on-line sample preconcentration are also described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据