4.0 Article

Mutant tumor necrosis factor receptor associated with tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated periodic syndrome is altered antigenically and is retained within patients' leukocytes

期刊

ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 56, 期 8, 页码 2765-2773

出版社

WILEY-LISS
DOI: 10.1002/art.22740

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective. To investigate the effect of mutations in tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 1A (TNFRSF1A) in TNFR-associated periodic syndrome (TRAPS) on the binding of anti-TNFRSF1A monoclonal antibodies (mAb), and to investigate the subcellular distribution of mutant versus wild-type (WT) TNFRSF1A in patients with TRAPS. Methods. HEK 293 cells transfected with WT and/or mutant TNFRSF1A were used to investigate the interaction of anti-TNFRSF1A mAb with the WT and mutant proteins. Monoclonal antibodies that differentially bound to C33Y TNFRSF1A were used to investigate the distribution of WT and mutant TNFRSF1A in TRAPS patients with the C33Y mutation. Results. We identified a mAb whose binding to TNFRSF1A was completely abolished by the C33Y or C52F TRAPS-associated mutations, whereas other mutations T50M, C88Y, R92Q) had lesser effects on the binding of this mAb. A different mAb was found to bind efficiently to all of the mutant forms of TNFRSF1A examined as well as to the WT receptor. Exploitation of the differential binding properties of these mAb indicated that mutant (as distinct from WT) TNFRSF1A showed abnormal intracellular retention in the neutrophils of TRAPS patients with the C33Y mutation, with little if any expression of mutant TNFRSF1A on the cell surface or as soluble receptor in plasma. Conclusion. TRAPS-associated mutant TNFRSF1A has an antigenically altered structure and shows abnormal retention in the leukocytes of patients with TRAPS, which is consistent with previous findings from in vitro and transgenic model systems. This is consistent with a misfolded protein response contributing to the pathophysiology of TRAPS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据