4.7 Article

Application of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AsFlFFF) coupled to inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) to the quantitative characterization of natural colloids and synthetic nanoparticles

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 392, 期 7-8, 页码 1447-1457

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-008-2422-0

关键词

Flow field-flow fractionation; Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry; Radionuclides; Colloids; Humic acids; Nanoparticles; Quantum dots; Quantification; Hydrodynamic size

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A straightforward quantification method is presented for the application of asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AsFlFFF) combined with inductively Coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) to the characterization of colloid-borne metal ions and nanoparticles. Reproducibility of the size calibration and recovery of elements are examined. Channel flow fluctuations are observed notably after initiation of the fractionation procedure. Their impact on quantification is considered by using 103 Rh as internal reference. Intensity ratios measured for various elements and Rh are calculated for each data point. These ratios turned out to be independent of the metal concentration and total sample solution flow introduced into the nebulizer within a range of 0.4-1.2 mL min(-1). The method is applied to Study the interaction of Eu, U(VI) and Th with a mixture of humic acid and clay colloids and to the characterization of synthetic nanoparticles, namely CdSe/ZnS-MAA (mercaptoacetic acid) core/shell-coated quantum dots (QDs). Information is given not only on inorganic element composition but also on the effective hydrodynamic size under relevant conditions. Detection limits (DLs) are estimated for Ca, Al, Fe, the lanthanide Cc and the natural actinides Th and U in colloid-containing groundwater. For standard crossflow nebulizer, estimated values are 7x 10(3), 20, 3 x 10(2), 0.1, 0.1 and 7 x 10(-2) mu g L-1, respectively. DLs for Zn and Cd in QD characterization are 28 and 11 mu g L-1, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据