4.7 Review

Electrochemical detection of acetylcholine and choline: application to the quantitative nonradiochemical evaluation of choline transport

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 392, 期 4, 页码 651-662

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-008-2307-2

关键词

acetylcholine; choline; capillary electrophoresis with electrochemical detection; enzyme microelectrodes; high-affinity choline transport; cholinergic inhibition

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R15 NS35305]
  2. The University of Toledo
  3. Ohio Board of Regents
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE [R15NS035305] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of analytical methods for determining the cholinergic biomarkers acetylcholine (ACh) and choline (Ch) is important for assessing their role in neurological and cognitive functions. In this review, electrochemical (EC) strategies to detect ACh and Ch are summarized and compared to other analysis methods. Recent research focusing on the development of a versatile nonradiochemical in vitro assay to evaluate Ch transport is also described. The assay coupled to analysis by capillary electrophoresis (CE) with indirect EC detection at an enzyme-modified microelectrode affords exceptional selectivity and sensitivity. Femtomole or lower mass detection limits for ACh (1 fmol) and Ch (100 amol) have been readily achieved, opening up a new range of possible experiments for investigating transport or turnover of Ch and ACh in neurobiological systems. The value of this method is illustrated through the evaluation of the pharmacological efficacy and mode of inhibition of a new class of quaternary ammonium alkyl-substituted catechol-based inhibitors of high-affinity choline transport (CHT). This microanalytical approach is particularly useful when knowledge of endogenous concentrations of Ch or ACh is desired or when the amount of available compounds or the sample size is limited. A brief description of the principles of CE is also provided.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据