4.4 Article

First report of homoanatoxin-a and associated dog neurotoxicosis in New Zealand

期刊

TOXICON
卷 50, 期 2, 页码 292-301

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2007.03.025

关键词

homoanatoxin-a; anatoxin-a; benthic cyanobacteria; Phormidium; 16S rRNA; New Zealand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In November 2005, at least five dogs died rapidly after contact with water from the Hutt River (lower North Island, New Zealand). Necropsy performed 24h later on one of the dogs (a 20-month-old Labrador) revealed few findings of interest, except for copious amounts of froth in the respiratory tract down to the bifurcation of the trachea and large quantities of algal material in the dog's stomach. Low and relatively stable flows in the Hutt River during spring had resulted in the proliferation of benthic cyanobacteria that formed large black/brown mats along the river edge. Samples from the Labrador's stomach contents and cyanobacterial mats were analysed microscopically and screened using chemical and biochemical assays for cyanotoxins: anatoxin-a, homoanatoxin-a, cylindrospermopsins, saxitoxins and microcyslins Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) confirmed the presence of the neurotoxic cyanotoxins anatoxin-a and bomoanatoxin-a and their degradation products, dihydro-anatoxin-a and dihydro-homoanatoxin-a. This is the first report of homoanatoxin-a and associated degradation product in New Zealand. Based on morphology, the causative species was identified as Phormidium sp. Subsequent phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences demonstrated that the causative organism was most similar to Phormidiurn autumnale. Further investigations led to the detection of homoanatoxin-a and anatoxin-a in cyanobacterial mats from four other rivers in the Wellington region (lower North Island, New Zealand). Access restrictions were placed on over 60% of river catchments in the western Wellington region, severely affecting recreational users. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据