4.6 Article

A hydrophobic element secures S4 voltage sensor in position in resting Shaker K+ channels

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON
卷 582, 期 3, 页码 1059-1072

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.131490

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The S4 transmembrane alpha-helix in voltage-gated channels contains several regularly spaced basic amino acid residues that could be protonated and moved across the membrane electric field in response to membrane potential changes. The translocation of the charge-carrying S4 transduces membrane voltage to gating conformational changes of the channel, but how it is positioned and moved with respect to membrane lipid remains controversial. We found that hydrophilic and especially arginine and lysine substitution for L361 at the external end of S4 causes a large negative shift with shallowed slope of both activation and inactivation curves in Shaker K+ channels. Also, the macroscopic kinetics of activation and inactivation become much faster and barely voltage dependent, especially in the L361 R mutant channel. These steady-state and kinetic data suggest that the replacement of one single hydrophobic residue, leucine, with arginine may profoundly destabilize the resting conformation of S4, which therefore takes a partially extruded position (partly activated position) at resting potentials (e.g. -120 mV). Consistently, the L361R point mutation gives rise to an extracellularly exposed R365C that is readily modified by external hydrophilic sulfhydryl-specific agents in the resting channel. Moreover, the extruded S4 in the L361 R mutant channel could be retracted by strong hyperpolarizing potentials (similar to -180 mV), from which the mutant channel is gated with slower kinetics but evidently stronger voltage dependence. We conclude that hydrophobic interaction involving a highly conserved residue at the top of S4 is crucial for properly securing the gating voltage sensor in the resting position and thus appropriate gating control of the voltage-gated channels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据