4.5 Article

Plant regeneration from protoplasts of Musa acuminata cv. Mas (AA) via somatic embryogenesis

期刊

PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE
卷 90, 期 2, 页码 191-200

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11240-007-9241-4

关键词

Musa acuminata cv; mas (AA); protoplast culture; somatic embryogenesis; cytokinin; plant regeneration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A protocol for plant regeneration from protoplasts of Musa acuminata cv. Mas (AA) via somatic embryogenesis was developed. Viable protoplasts were isolated from embryogenic cell suspensions at a yield of 1.2 x10(7) protoplasts/ml packed cell volume (PCV). Liquid and feeder layer culture systems with medium-A and medium-B were used for protoplast culture. In liquid culture system, medium-B was more efficient for inducing cell division (17.5% at 14 days) and colony formation (6.7% at 28 days) than medium-A. However, all protoplast-derived cell colonies (PDCC) obtained from liquid culture system could not develop further. In feeder layer culture system, there was no significant difference between medium-A and medium-B on cell division and colony formation of the cultured protoplasts, and the cell division frequency at 14 days and colony formation frequency at 28 days were 24.5% and 11.2%, respectively, in medium-B. Comparative study on the effects of BAP (2.2 mu M, 4.4 mu M, 8.8 mu M), zeatin (0.4 mu M, 0.8 mu M, 1.2 mu M) and TDZ (0.2 mu M, 0.4 mu M, 0.6 mu M) on embryo formation of PDCC from feeder-layer culture indicated that TDZ was best. TDZ at 0.4 mu M induced 7906 mature embryos per ml PCV PDCC, which was 4-fold the frequency as with BAP at 4.4 mu M, 7.5-fold as with zeatin at 0.8 mu M and 150-fold as control medium (no mentioned cytokinins) after 45 days on M3 medium. About 44% of the mature embryos were converted into plantlets with poor root system after subculture on M4 medium. Root further development of regenerated plantlets was promoted by addition of activated charcoal (AC) to MS basal medium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据