4.7 Article

Quantitative solid phase microextraction - Gas chromatography mass spectrometry analysis of five megastigmatrienone isomers in aged wine

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 813, 期 -, 页码 63-69

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.01.019

关键词

Megastigmatrienone; Mass spectrometry; Gas chromatography; Solid phase microextraction; Wine; Tobacco aroma

资金

  1. French Ministere de l'Enseignement Superieur et de la Recherche (MESR - France)
  2. Comite Interprofessionnel des Vins de Bordeaux (CIVB - Bordeaux Wine Council)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Megastigmatrienone is a key flavor compound in tobacco. It has also been detected in wine, where it may contribute to a tobacco/incense aroma, but its importance and concentration in wines had never previously been evaluated. A method was developed and validated for quantifying the five megastigmatrienone isomers in red and white wines. Megastigmatrienone isomers were extracted by headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME), with a 65 mu m film thickness polydimethylsiloxane-divinylbenzene (PDMS-DVB) fiber and analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) in selected ion monitoring mode (SIM). Several parameters affecting the length of the adsorption process (i.e., adding salt, extraction time and extraction temperature) were tested. The optimum analytical conditions were established. The LOQ were between 0.06 mu g L-1 and 0.49 mu g L-1 for white wine and 0.11 mu g L-1 and 0.98 mu g L-1 for red wine, repeatability in both types of wine was less than 10% and recovery ranged from 96% for white wine to 94% for red wine. The five isomers of megastigmatrienone were quantified in red and white wines for the first time. Concentrations ranged from 2 mu g L-1 to 41 mu g L-1 in both red and white wines. Initial results revealed a link between wine aging and megastigmatrienone levels, indicating that megastigmatrienone may be a component in wine bouquet. (C) 2014 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据