4.7 Article

Chemometric processing of second-order liquid chromatographic data with UV-vis and fluorescence detection. A comparison of multivariate curve resolution and parallel factor analysis 2

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 842, 期 -, 页码 11-19

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.07.007

关键词

Parallel factor analysis 2; Multivariate curve resolution-alternating least-squares; Non-trilinear chromatographic data; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Pesticides; Second-order advantage

资金

  1. Universidad Nacional de Rosario
  2. CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas)
  3. ANPCyT (Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica) [PICT 2010-0084]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Second-order liquid chromatographic data with multivariate spectral (UV-vis or fluorescence) detection usually show changes in elution time profiles from sample to sample, causing a loss of trilinearity in the data. In order to analyze them with an appropriate model, the latter should permit a given component to have different time profiles in different samples. Two popular models in this regard are multivariate curve resolution-alternating least-squares (MCR-ALS) and parallel factor analysis 2 (PARAFAC2). The conditions to be fulfilled for successful application of the latter model are discussed on the basis of simple chromatographic concepts. An exhaustive analysis of the multivariate calibration models is carried out, employing both simulated and experimental chromatographic data sets. The latter involve the quantitation of benzimidazolic and carbamate pesticides in fruit and juice samples using liquid chromatography with diode array detection, and of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water samples, in both cases in the presence of potential interferents using liquid chromatography with fluorescence spectral detection, thereby achieving the second-order advantage. The overall results seem to favor MCR-ALS over PARAFAC2, especially in the presence of potential interferents. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据