4.3 Article

P19Ink4d and p18Ink4c cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in the male reproductive axis

期刊

MOLECULAR REPRODUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
卷 74, 期 8, 页码 997-1007

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mrd.20716

关键词

cell cycle; spermatogenesis

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [U54 HD035041, U54-HD35041] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The loss of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) P18(Ink4c) and p 19(Ink4d) leads to male reproductive defects (Franklin et al., 1998. Genes Dev 12: 2899-2911; Zindy et al., 2000. Mol Cell Biol 20: 372-378; Zindy et al., 2001. Mol Cell Biol 21: 3244-3255). In order to assess whether these inhibitors directly or indirectly affect male germ cell differentiation, we examined the expression of p18(Ink4c) and p19(Ink1d) in spermatogenic and supporting cells in the testis and in pituitary gonadotropes. Both p18(Ink4c) and p19(Ink4d) are most abundant in the testis after 18 days of age and are expressed in purified populations of spermatogenic and testicular somatic cells. Different p18(Ink4c) mRNAs are expressed in isolated spermatogenic and Leydig cells. Spermatogenic cells also express a novel p19(Ink4d) transcript that is distinct from the smaller transcript expressed in Sertoli cells, Leydig cells and in other tissues. Immunohistochemistry detected significant levels of p19(Ink4d) in preleptotene spermatocytes, pachytene spermatocytes, condensing spermatids, and Sertoli cells. Immunoprecipitation-Western analysis detected both CKl proteins in isolated pachytene spermatocytes and round spermatids. CDK4/6-CKl complexes were detected in germ cells by co-immunoprecipitation, although the composition differed by cell type. p19(Ink4d) was also identified in FSH+ gonadotrophs, suggesting that this CKl may be independently required in the pituitary. Possible cell autonomous and paracrine mechanisms for the spermatogenic defects in mice lacking p18(Ink4c) or p19(Ink4d) are supported by expression of these CKls in spermatogenic cells and in somatic cells of the testis and pituitary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据