4.7 Article

Acute appendicitis in the setting of Clostridium difficile colitis:: Case report and review of the literature

期刊

CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
卷 5, 期 8, 页码 969-971

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.04.016

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A 72-year-old man was hospitalized for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and was treated with oral prednisone and 7 days of moxifloxacin. Five days after completing the antibiotic course, he developed watery diarrhea and diffuse, crampy abdominal pain. On presentation he was afebrile, and abdominal examination revealed diffuse tenderness without peritoneal signs. Stool tested positive for Clostridium difficile toxin A by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Despite starting oral metronidazole, the patient developed a fever of 101.2 degrees F 36 hours after his initial episode of diarrhea, 12 hours after admission. His abdominal pain intensified and became localized to the right and left lower quadrants. Computed tomography scan revealed both a thickened cecal wall and an edematous appendix with ileocecal stranding consistent with appendicitis. Appendectomy was performed, and the appendix was found to be suppurative in appearance and nonperforated. The cecum had mild edema and erythema, whereas the colon and rectum were grossly unaffected. Pathology examination revealed exudative material in the appendiceal lumen and a diffuse transmural inflammatory cell infiltrate. The patient had an uneventful recovery and continued to improve on oral metronidazole. Although Clostridium difficile colitis and appendicitis are each very common independently, C difficile as an etiology of appendicitis is exceedingly rare. A review of the literature revealed 2 prior cases. We speculate that this association is underdiagnosed, because milder cases might respond to antibiotic therapy alone, and severe cases might involve the entire colon and require total colectomy. In each scenario, the involvement of the appendix might be overlooked.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据