4.7 Article

An appropriate and systematized procedure for validating qualitative methods: Its application in the detection of sulfonamide residues in raw milk

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 830, 期 -, 页码 11-22

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.04.050

关键词

Validation; Qualitative method; Performance parameters; Sulfonamides; Residues; Milk

资金

  1. FAPEMIG
  2. CAPES
  3. CNPQ
  4. Hexis Cientifica Ltd

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The lack of well-established references for the validation of qualitative analyses and the increasing demand for reliable binary responses were the main motivating factors for this study. A detailed procedure for single- laboratory validation of qualitative methods is proposed. The experimental design and the tools for data analysis were based on the theoretical background, as well as the aspects of efficiency, convenience and simplicity. Four experimental steps were defined, as follows: (i) preliminary tests for the determination of the concentration range, (ii) a study of the rates, unreliability region, detection limit, and the accordance and concordance values, (iii) a study of the selectivity in the presence of known interferences, and (iv) a study of robustness. The applicability of the procedure was demonstrated by the validation of a qualitative commercial kit for detecting sulfonamide residues in raw milk using both the visual and instrumental reading techniques. Reliability rates of 100% were obtained for the blank samples. For the samples spiked with sulfamethazine at 10.8 and 108 mg L (1) and with sulfadimethoxine or sulfathiazole at 10 and 100 mg L (1), the reliability rates ranged from 93.3 to 100%. Selectivity was demonstrated using trimethoprim as a potential interferent. The method was considered robust for the factors of the temperature (54 and 58 degrees C) and time (6 and 10 min) for incubating the test strips. The estimated detection limits and unreliability regions confirmed the suitability of the kit for this purpose, based on the legislated residue limits. (C) 2014 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据