4.5 Article

Human glycine α1 receptor inhibition by quercetin is abolished or inversed by α267 mutations in transmembrane domain 2

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1161, 期 -, 页码 1-10

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.05.057

关键词

flavonoid; quercetin; glycine; glycine receptor; ligand-gated ion channel; Xenopus oocytes

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [핵C6A2501, 2004-01418, R0A-2004-000-10372-0, 과C6A2401] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Quercetin, one of the flavonoids, is a compound of low molecular weight found in fruits and vegetables. Besides its antioxidative effect, quercetin also shows a wide range of diverse neuropharmacological actions. However, the cellular mechanisms of quercetin's actions, especially onligand-gated ion channels and synaptic transmissions, are not well studied. We investigated the effect of quercetin on the human glycine alpha l receptor channel expressed in Xenopus oocytes using a two-electrode voltage clamp technique. Application of quercetin reversibly inhibited glycine-induced current (I-Gly). Quercetin's inhibition depends on its dose, with an IC50 of 21.5 +/- .2 mu M. The inhibition was sensitive to membrane voltages. Site-directed mutations of S267 to S267Y but not S267A, S267F, S267G, S267K, S267L and S267T at transmembrane domain 2 (TM2) nearly abolished quercetin-induced inhibition of I-Gly. In contrast, in site-directed mutant receptors such as S267 to S267I, S267R and S267V, quercetin enhanced I-GIy compared to the wild-type receptor. The EC50 was 22.6 +/- 1.4, 25.5 +/- 4.2, and 14.5 +/- 3.1 pM for S267I, S267R and S267V, respectively. These results indicate that quercetin might regulate the human glycine a, receptor via interaction with amino acid residue alpha 267 and that alpha 267 plays a key role in determining the regulatory consequences of the human glycine al receptor by quercetin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据