4.7 Article

Ultrasensitive electrochemical sensor for p-nitrophenyl organophosphates based on ordered mesoporous carbons at low potential without deoxygenization

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 822, 期 -, 页码 23-29

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2014.03.023

关键词

Electrochemical sensor; p-Nitrophenyl organophosphates; Ordered mesoporous carbons; Voltammetric detection

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91227116, 21173049, 21275152]
  2. Hundred-Talent-Project, Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSCX2-YW-BR-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

p-Nitrophenyl organophosphates (OPs) including paraoxon, parathion and methyl parathion, etc, are highly poisonous OPs, for which sensitive and rapid detection method is most needed. In this work, an ultrasensitive electrochemical sensor for the determination of p-nitrophenyl OPs was developed based on ordered mesoporous carbons (OMCs) modified glassy carbon electrode (GCE) (OMCs/GCE). The electrochemical behavior and reaction mechanism of p-nitrophenyl OPs at OMCs/GCE was elaborated by taking paraoxon as an example. Experimental conditions such as buffer pH, preconcentration potential and time were optimized. By using differential pulse voltammetry, the current response of the sensor at -0.085 V was linear with concentration within 0.01-1.00 mu M and 1.00-20 mu M paraoxon. Similar linear ranges of 0.015-0.5 mu M and 0.5-10 mu M were found for parathion, and 0.01-0.5 mu M and 0.5-10 mu M for methyl parathion. The low limits of detection were evaluated to be 1.9 nM for paraoxon, 3.4 nM for parathion and 2.1 nM for methyl parathion (S/N = 3). Common interfering species had no interference to the detection of p-nitrophenyl OPs. The sensor can be applicable to real samples measurement. Therefore, a simple, sensitive, reproducible and cost-effective electrochemical sensor was proposed for the fast direct determination of trace p-nitrophenyl OPs at low potential without deoxygenization. (C) 2014 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据