4.5 Article

Simulation of motoneuron morphology in three dimensions. II. Building complete neurons

期刊

JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
卷 503, 期 5, 页码 701-716

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cne.21417

关键词

spinal cord; neuronal architecture; data analysis; computational models

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using dendrogram data from six adult cat alpha motoneurons, we have constructed computer simulations of these cells in three dimensions (3D) by growing their dendritic trees from stem branches that were oriented as in the original cells. Individual trees were simulated by using the algorithms and parameters discussed in the companion paper (Marks and Burke [2007] J. Comp. Neurol. 503:685-700). It was not possible to distinguish real from simulated motoneurons by visual inspection of 3D drawings. Simulated cells were compared quantitatively with their actual exemplars by using features that were measured in spherical shells at various radii centered on the soma. These included nearest neighbor distances (NNDs) between branches, the sizes and overlaps between the territories of individual dendrites measured as convex hulls (polygons that enclose all branches passing through a shell), and the sizes of circular zones that contained no branches. We also compared the 3D fractal dimensions and lacunarity (a measure of the 3D dispersion of branches) in actual cells and their simulations. The statistical properties of these quantitative measures were not significantly different, suggesting that the simulation algorithm was quite successful. However, there were three exceptions: 1) there were more NNIDs at distances < 50 mu in simulated than in actual motoneurons; 2) average overlaps between the territories of different dendrites were almost twice as large in simulated compared with actual motoneurons; and 3) estimates of lacunarity were also larger in simulated cells. These exceptions suggest that dendritic branches in actual motoneurons tend to avoid one another. We discuss possible interpretations of these results. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据