4.5 Article

Modulation of food reward by adiposity signals

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 91, 期 5, 页码 473-478

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.10.008

关键词

insulin; leptin; ventral tegmental area; dopamine; self-administration

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [P20 RR020774, 5 P20 RR020774] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAAA NIH HHS [T32 AA007455] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK040963-18, R01 DK040963-20, R01 DK40963, R01 DK040963, R01 DK040963-19] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extensive historical evidence from the drug abuse literature has provided support for the concept that there is functional communication between central nervous system (CNS) circuitries which subserve reward/motivation, and the regulation of energy homeostasis. This concept is substantiated by recent studies that map anatomical pathways, or which demonstrate that hormones and neurotransmitters associated with energy homeostasis regulation can directly modulate reward and motivation behaviors. Studies from our laboratory have focused specifically on the candidate adiposity hormones, insulin and leptin, and show that these hormones can decrease performance in behavioral paradigms that assess the rewarding or motivating properties of food. Additionally we and others have provided evidence that the ventral tegmental area may be one direct target for these effects, and we are currently exploring other potential anatomical targets. Finally, we are beginning to explore the interaction between adiposity signals, chronic maintenance diet of rats, and different types of food rewards to more closely simulate the current food environments of Westernized societies including the U.S. We propose that future studies of food reward should include a more complex environment in the experimental design that takes into account abundance and variety of rewarding foods, psychological stressors, and choices of reward modalities. (C) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据