4.5 Article

Central α-melanocyte stimulating hormone attenuates behavioral effects of neuropeptide Y in chicks

期刊

PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR
卷 91, 期 5, 页码 588-592

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.021

关键词

alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone; behavior; chick; neuropeptide y

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This experiment was conducted to determine the effects of central a-melanocyte stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) and its interaction with neuropeptide Y (NPY) on ingestive and non-ingestive behaviors in chicks. Chicks received intracerebroventricular injections of either 0, 0. 12 nM alpha-MSH, 0.06 nM NPY, or 0.12 nM alpha-MSH+0.06 nM NPY. Immediately following injection, chicks were placed in an observation arena and the number of steps, jumps, feed pecks, drinks, exploratory pecks, escape attempts, the total distance traveled, and the amount of time spent standing, sitting, sleeping, and preening were monitored for 60 min. Chicks treated with NPY consumed 69% more feed than controls whereas alpha-MSH-treated chicks consumed 71 % less. Feed intake of the NPY + alpha-MSH groups was similar to alpha-MSH-treated chicks at 66% less than aCSF-treated chicks. Differences in pecking were found and followed a similar pattern as feed intake. All treatments increased the amount of time chicks were in a sitting posture, and the alpha-MSH+NPY group spent more time sitting than alpha-MSH and NPY alone. The sitting response after alpha-MSH+NPY treatment was similar to the alpha-MSH group but not the NPY group. Other behaviors were not affected by treatment. Thus, we conclude that alpha-MSH, at a concentration that causes a similar magnitude decrease in feed intake as NPY increases feed intake, is a more potent appetite-related signal than NPY. a-MSH causes behavioral effects that may secondarily affect feed intake at a low magnitude and may modulate the behavioral effects of NPY in chicks, contributing to the overall effect on feed intake. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据