4.6 Article

A novel role for the bactericidal/permeability increasing protein in interactions of gram-negative bacterial outer membrane Blebs with dendritic cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 179, 期 4, 页码 2477-2484

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2477

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [AI59372] Funding Source: Medline
  2. PHS HHS [P0144642] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein (BPI) is thought to play an important role in killing and clearance of Gram negative bacteria and the neutralization of endotoxin. A possible role for BPI in clearance of cell-free endotoxin has also been suggested based on studies with purified endotoxin aggregates and blood monocytes. Because the interaction of BPI with cell-free endotoxin, during infection, occurs mainly in tissue and most likely in the form of shed bacterial outer membrane vesicles (blebs), we examined the effect of BPI on interactions of metabolically labeled ([C-14]-acetate) blebs purified from Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B with either human monocyte-derived macrophages or monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MDDC). BPI produced a dose-dependent increase (up to Mold) in delivery of C-14-labeled blebs to MDDC, but not to monocyte-derived macrophages in the presence or absence of serum. Both, fluorescently labeled blebs and BPI were internalized by MDDC under these conditions. The closely related LPS-binding protein, in contrast to BPI, did not increase association of the blebs with MDDC. BPI-enhanced delivery of the blebs to MDDC did not increase cell activation but permitted CD14-dependent signaling by the blebs as measured by changes in MDDC morphology, surface expression of CD80, CD83, CD86, and MHC class II and secretion of IL-8, RANTES, and IP-10. These findings suggest a novel role of BPI in the interaction of bacterial outer membrane vesicles with dendritic cells that may help link innate immune recognition of endotoxin to Ag delivery and presentation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据