4.6 Article

Development of Sjogren's syndrome in Nonobese diabetic-derived autoimmune-prone C57BL/6.NOD-Aec1Aec2 mice is dependent on complement component-3

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 179, 期 4, 页码 2318-2329

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2318

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [R01 DE014344, T32 DE07200, DE014344, R21 DE015152, DE015152, R01 DE014344-04, T32 DE007200, DE013769, R01 DE013769] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The role of complement in the etiology of Sjogren's syndrome (SjS), a human autoimmune disease manifested primarily by salivary and lacrimal gland dysfunction resulting in dry mouth/dry eye syndrome, remains ill-defined. In the present study, we examined the role of complement component-3 (C3) using a newly constructed C3-gene knockout mouse, C57BL/6.NOD-Aec/Aec2.C3(-/-). Inactivation of C3 in the parental C57BL/6.NOD.Aec1Aec2 strain, a model of primary SjS, resulted in a diminished or total absence of both preclinical and clinical manifestations during development and onset of disease, including reduced acinar cell apoptosis, reduced levels of caspase-3, lack of leukocyte infiltration of submandibular glands, reduced synthesis of disease-associated autoantibodies, maintenance of normal glandular architecture, and retention of normal saliva secretion. In addition, C57BL/6-NOD.Aec1Aec2.C3(-/-) mice did not exhibit increased numbers of marginal zone B cells, a feature of SjS-prone C57BL/6-NOD.Aec1Aec2 mice. Interestingly, C57BL/6-NOD.Aec1Aec2.C3(-/-) mice retained some early pathological manifestations, including activation of serine kinases with proteolytic activity for parotid secretory protein. This improvement in the clinical manifestations of SjS-like disease in C57BL/6.NOD.Aec1Aec2.C3(-/-) mice, apparently a direct consequence of C3 deficiency, supports a much more important role for complement in the adaptive autoimmune response than previously recognized, possibly implicating an essential role for innate immunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据