4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Spatial prediction of soil properties using EBLUP with the Matern covariance function

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 140, 期 4, 页码 324-336

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.04.028

关键词

Best Linear Unbiased Predictor; kriging; semivariogram; geostatistics; REML; digital soil mapping

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatial prediction with the presence of spatially dense ancillary variables has attracted research in pedometrics. While soil survey and analysis of soil properties are still expensive and time consuming, the secondary data can be made available on a dense grid for the whole area of interest. The main aim of using the ancillary data is to enhance prediction of soil properties by making use of the ancillary variables as covariates. Methods that can be used for this purpose are kriging with external drift, cokriging, regression kriging, and REML-EBLUP (Residual Maximum Likelihood-Empirical Best Linear Unbiased Predictor). Regression kriging is a sub-optimal method that has been utilised extensively because it is easy to use and has been shown empirically to perform as well as other methods. A statically sound method is REML-EBLUP. This paper examines the use of REML-EBLUP in combination with the Matern covariance function for spatial prediction of soil properties. Methods for estimating parameters of the Matern variogram using REML, and prediction with EBLUP are described. The prediction capability of REML-EBLUP, regression kriging, and ordinary kriging is compared for four datasets. Results show that although REML-EBLUP generally improves the prediction, the improvement is small compared with regression kriging. Thus, for practical applications regression kriging appears to be a robust method. REML-EBLUP is useful when the trend is strong, and the number of observations is small (<200). We concluded that improvement in the prediction of soil properties does not rely on more sophisticated statistical methods, but rather on gathering more useful and higher quality data. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据