4.7 Article

An electronic channel switching-based aptasensor for ultrasensitive protein detection

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 758, 期 -, 页码 130-137

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.10.019

关键词

Electrochemical analysis; Aptasensor; Immunoglobulin E; Aptamer-protein interaction; Electronic channel switching

资金

  1. NSFC [21275002, 91117006, 20905022, 21035001, 21190041]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program [2011CB911000]
  3. CSIRT Program, NSF of Hunan Province [10JJ7002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Due to the ubiquity and essential of the proteins in all living organisms, the identification and quantification of disease-specific proteins are particularly important. Because the conformational change of aptamer upon its target or probe/target/probe sandwich often is the primary prerequisite for the design of an electrochemical aptameric assay system, it is extremely difficult to construct the electrochemical aptasensor for protein assay because the corresponding aptamers cannot often meet the requirement. To circumvent the obstacles mentioned, an electronic channel switching-based (ECS) aptasensor for ultra-sensitive protein detection is developed. The essential achievement made is that an innovative sensing concept is proposed: the hairpin structure of aptamer is designed to pull electroactive species toward electrode surface and makes the surface-immobilized IgE serve as a barrier that separates enzyme from its substrate. It seemingly ensures that the ECS aptasensor exhibits most excellent assay features, such as, a detection limit of 4.44 X 10(-6) mu g mL(-1) (22.7 fM, 220 zmol in 10-mu L sample) (demonstrating a 5 orders of magnitude improvement in detection sensitivity compared with classical electronic aptasensors) and dynamic response range from 4.44 x 10(-6) to 4.44 x 10(-1) mu gmL(-1). We believe that the described sensing concept here might open a new avenue for the detection of proteins and other biomacromolecules. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据