4.6 Article

Influence of static and dynamical structural changes on ultrafast processes mediated by conical intersections

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2007.01.032

关键词

molecular photo switches; photogromic fulgides; ultrafast quantum dynamics; extended conical intersections; time-varying potentials; control concepts

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The technological needs imposed by the exponential miniaturization trend of conventional electronic devices has drawn attention towards the development of smaller and faster devices like ultrafast molecular switches. In recent years molecular switches emerge again in the focus of active and innovative research with state-of-the-art optical tools recording their dynamics in real time. Still many questions about the underlying microscopic mechanism are left open, including potential factors that effect the switching process in either way, improve or worsen it. Due to the complexity of such molecules it is difficult to obtain a global answer from experiment alone. On the other side molecular switches are generally too large for a complete quantum chemical and quantum dynamical calculation. In our group we therefore developed an ab initio based modular model to handle the laser induced quantum dynamics in molecular switches like fulgides. It enables us to study the effect of internal molecular coupling and of the molecular response to external fields. We can investigate the related wave packet dynamics, the switching efficiency and the controllability. Our results focus on the laser induced ring opening in fulgides, which equals one direction of the switching process. Presented are the influence of a conical intersection seam and of time-dependent potentials, mimicking the mean interaction with the environment. Furthermore the relation of controllability and the wave packet's momentum is studied and the influence of potential barriers on the switching dynamics is shown. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据