4.7 Article

Facile synthesis of graphene hybrid tube-like structure for simultaneous detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine, uric acid and tryptophan

期刊

ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 756, 期 -, 页码 7-12

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2012.10.044

关键词

Graphene sheets; 3.4.9.10-Perylenetetracarboxylic acid; Ascorbic acid; Dopamine; Uric acid; Tryptophan

资金

  1. NNSF of China [21075100, 21275119]
  2. Ministry of Education of China [708073]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Chongqing City [CSTC-2009BA1003, CSTC-2010BB4121, CSTC-2011BA7003]
  4. Special and Research Fund for Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20100182110015]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Electroanalytical Chemistry [SKIEAC 2010009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present work, a tube-like structure of graphene hybrid as modifier to fabricate electrode for simultaneous detection of ascorbic acid (AA), dopamine (DA), uric acid (UA) and tryptophan (Trp) was reported. The hybrid was synthesized by a simple method based on graphene sheets (GS) and 3,4,9,10-perylenetetracarboxylic acid (PTCA) via pi-pi stacking interaction under ultrasonic condition. The combination of GS and PICA could effectively improve the dispersion of GS, owing to PTCA with the carboxylic-functionalized interface. Comparing with pure GS or PTCA modified electrode, CS-PICA displayed high catalytic activity and selectivity toward the oxidation of AA, DA, UA. and Trp. Moreover, cyclic voltammetry, different pulse voltammetry and scanning electron microscopy were employed to characterize the sensors. The experiment results showed that the linear response range for simultaneous detection of AA, DA, UA, and Trp were 20-420 mu M, 0.40-374 mu M, 4-544 mu M and 0.40-138 mu M, respectively, and the detection limits were 5.60 mu M. 0.13 mu M, 0.92 mu M and 0.06 mu M (S/N = 3). Importantly, the proposed method offers promise for simple, rapid, selective and cost-effective analysis of small biomolecules. (C) 201 2 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据