4.8 Article

FishNet: an online database of zebrafish anatomy

期刊

BMC BIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7007-5-34

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. MRC [MC_U127574434] Funding Source: UKRI
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_U127574434] Funding Source: researchfish
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U127574434] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NINDS NIH HHS [R01 NS041353] Funding Source: Medline
  5. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Over the last two decades, zebrafish have been established as a genetically versatile model system for investigating many different aspects of vertebrate developmental biology. With the credentials of zebrafish as a developmental model now well recognized, the emerging new opportunity is the wider application of zebrafish biology to aspects of human disease modelling. This rapidly increasing use of zebrafish as a model for human disease has necessarily generated interest in the anatomy of later developmental phases such as the larval, juvenile, and adult stages, during which many of the key aspects of organ morphogenesis and maturation take place. Anatomical resources and references that encompass these stages are non-existent in zebrafish and there is therefore an urgent need to understand how different organ systems and anatomical structures develop throughout the life of the fish. Results: To overcome this deficit we have utilized the technique of optical projection tomography to produce three-dimensional (3D) models of larval fish. In order to view and display these models we have created FishNet http://www.fishnet.org.au, an interactive reference of zebrafish anatomy spanning the range of zebrafish development from 24 h until adulthood. Conclusion: FishNet contains more than 36 000 images of larval zebrafish, with more than 1 500 of these being annotated. The 3D models can be manipulated on screen or virtually sectioned. This resource represents the first complete embryo to adult atlas for any species in 3D.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据