4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Phase II trial of sorafenib in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or nasopharyngeal carcinoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 25, 期 24, 页码 3766-3773

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2871

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To determine the efficacy and safety of single- agent sorafenib in patients with recurrent and/ or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck ( SCCHN) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma ( NPC). Patients and Methods In this single- arm phase II trial, oral continuous sorafenib was administered in 28- day cycles. Patients had <= one line of chemotherapy for recurrent and/ or metastatic disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of <= 2, and adequate organ function. At the end of stage 1, efficacy criteria for further accrual were not met, but the study was amended to enroll an additional five patients for paired tumor biopsies. Results Twenty- seven and 26 patients were eligible for toxicity and efficacy evaluations, respectively. One patient ( 3.7%; 95% CI, 0.1% to 19.0%) achieved a partial response. Disease stabilization was maintained in 10 patients ( 37.0%; 95% CI, 22.4% to 61.2%). The median time to progression was 1.8 months ( 95% CI, 1.6 to 3.4 months), and median overall survival time was 4.2 months ( 95% CI, 3.6 to 8.7 months). Sorafenib was well tolerated with few grade 3 and no grade 4 toxicities. Biomarker analysis of paired tumor samples before and after treatment with sorafenib revealed a decrease of pERK in all five patients, with a decrease in Ki67 in four patients, consistent with a disruption of ERK signaling. The antiapoptotic protein Mcl- 1 was downregulated in four patients, and there was also evidence of antiangiogenic activity. Conclusion Sorafenib was well tolerated and had modest anticancer activity comparable to monotherapy with other targeted agents in this group of patients. Further development in combination with radiation or other agents may be warranted.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据