4.6 Article

Endometrial polyps in pre- and postmenopausal women: Factors associated with malignancy

期刊

MATURITAS
卷 57, 期 4, 页码 415-421

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.04.010

关键词

menopause; anormal bleeding; risk factors

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence of premalignant and malignant polyps and their association with menopausal status, hormone therapy and clinical characteristics in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Methods: A surgical database was used to select pre- and postmenopausal women >= 40 years of age, submitted to hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps. The medical records of 475 women were reviewed and clinical characteristics and histological diagnosis of resected polyps were assessed. Results: The majority of women had benign endometriall lesions, 78.53% of which were endometrial polyps and 13.47% polyps with simple or complex endometrial hyperplasia without atypia. Polyps with endometrial hyperplasia with atypia comprised 1.05% of cases, while 2.74% were carcinomatous polyps. Analysis using prevalence ratios showed that premalignant and malignant lesions were associated with age and postmenopausal bleeding. Women > 60 years of age had a prevalence ratio 3.28 times greater (95%CI: 1.19-9.07) of premalignant or malignant polyps. When only postmenopausal women were evaluated for the effect of age, those over 60 years, of age had a prevalence 5.31 times greater (95%CI: 1.22-23.09), while those with postmenopausal bleeding had an age-adjusted prevalence ratio of 3.71 (95%CI: 1.21-11.34) compared to asymptomatic women. No significant association was found between arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, obesity, use of hormone therapy or tarnoxifen and premalignancy or malignancy. Conclusions: There was a low prevalence of premalignant and malignant lesions in endometrial polyps. Older women and those with postmenopausal bleeding had a greater prevalence of malignancy and in these cases hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps is mandatory. (c) 2007 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据